Posted: 19 Jan 2016, 10:23
Is there any news on rounding off the bar above the keys a little to make it match the original ?
mechanical keyboard authority
https://ns1.deskthority.net/
No, you are in luck the expectation is orders will open by the end of he month, after validation of the production samples.The_Beast wrote:As someone who just found this page, the GB hasn't opened yet right?
There is still a way to go before they are finally available to purchase because Ellipse is working on fine tweaking them to DT's high standards.
That looks cool, but wouldn't it be better to have the Fn next to the right Shift? Or is the purpose of this to use caps Unicomp makes?gnarlsagan wrote:I'd like to know if anyone else is interested in bhtooefr's layout:
If so, it would be helpful if we had more people to contribute to required tooling costs, which will probably be around $500 according to Ellipse. I don't mind paying extra myself, but it would be nice to gauge interest to see if anyone else would like to contribute.
Once the initial tooling cost is covered, anyone would be able to order bhtooefr's layout as one of the pre-assembled options!
Please PM myself or Ellipse, or just post in this thread if this layout is something you'd like to have. It's similar to the one he posted recently, except it retains a right alt key at the expense of shortening the row one modifiers on the left side.
That is a great idea. Thank you for your input. I'm not at all married to the left bottom row mods. At a minimum I'd like to keep the arrow keys and the right Alt key. I made this based on your suggestion, and I actually think it's a bit cleaner:romevi wrote:That looks cool, but wouldn't it be better to have the Fn next to the right Shift? Or is the purpose of this to use caps Unicomp makes?gnarlsagan wrote:I'd like to know if anyone else is interested in bhtooefr's layout:
If so, it would be helpful if we had more people to contribute to required tooling costs, which will probably be around $500 according to Ellipse. I don't mind paying extra myself, but it would be nice to gauge interest to see if anyone else would like to contribute.
Once the initial tooling cost is covered, anyone would be able to order bhtooefr's layout as one of the pre-assembled options!
Please PM myself or Ellipse, or just post in this thread if this layout is something you'd like to have. It's similar to the one he posted recently, except it retains a right alt key at the expense of shortening the row one modifiers on the left side.
Looking forward to the videos!Ellipse wrote:Success! Success! Success!
I just assembled the F62 prototype complete inner assembly and can confirm that this Model F redesign project is a success! It truly deserves the Model F moniker. We will be going forward with the group buy before month end. I will definitely continue testing and making the final pre-production adjustments as the prototypes are not 100% (nor were they expected to be perfect!). I have made and will keep making design adjustments even as small as 0.1 mm to make them good.
Keys buckle correctly and are recognized on the computer - the new capacitive flippers do their job just as well as the originals so far. There are no ghost signals as of yet. The keyboard sounds eerily similar to my little used, original refurbished 77 key 4704 with Ensolite foam (the project uses Neoprene/EDPM type foam from McMaster-Carr) - you can tell the difference between the two but it was a lot closer than expected. Of course it does sound different from my worn out F's with degraded foam (the F77 original, and just about each Model F in my collection, sounds different from just about every other Model F!). The keys are crisp and have a solid amount of musicality to them like the original 77 key 4704 - far from the point where it would annoy most people in my view (some F's have more musicality, some have less).
One interesting note is that the improved manufacturing processes and tolerances have allowed for a more consistent sound to each key - granted the keys do sound different from each other and still have a mildly musical quality to them, though they are less random in their sound. These better tolerances also make for more consistent barrels. In test measurements I have noticed very low sample to sample variation.
Also the final barrel molds were completed - these samples will be with the final barrel design. Each barrel will have a number on its underside since I ordered a multi-cavity mold. IBM gave a code to each barrel so they could know when a mold cavity needed to be adjusted if it was producing out-of-spec injection-molded parts.
I will continue making the hand adjustments to the prototypes and making those adjustments in the CAD files. Before opening orders I want the prototypes to be as close to the final production units as possible and I want to take photos and make a video beforehand.
Looking forward to the videos!Ellipse wrote:Success! Success! Success!
I just assembled the F62 prototype complete inner assembly and can confirm that this Model F redesign project is a success! It truly deserves the Model F moniker. We will be going forward with the group buy before month end. I will definitely continue testing and making the final pre-production adjustments as the prototypes are not 100% (nor were they expected to be perfect!). I have made and will keep making design adjustments even as small as 0.1 mm to make them good.
Keys buckle correctly and are recognized on the computer - the new capacitive flippers do their job just as well as the originals so far. There are no ghost signals as of yet. The keyboard sounds eerily similar to my little used, original refurbished 77 key 4704 with Ensolite foam (the project uses Neoprene/EDPM type foam from McMaster-Carr) - you can tell the difference between the two but it was a lot closer than expected. Of course it does sound different from my worn out F's with degraded foam (the F77 original, and just about each Model F in my collection, sounds different from just about every other Model F!). The keys are crisp and have a solid amount of musicality to them like the original 77 key 4704 - far from the point where it would annoy most people in my view (some F's have more musicality, some have less).
One interesting note is that the improved manufacturing processes and tolerances have allowed for a more consistent sound to each key - granted the keys do sound different from each other and still have a mildly musical quality to them, though they are less random in their sound. These better tolerances also make for more consistent barrels. In test measurements I have noticed very low sample to sample variation.
Also the final barrel molds were completed - these samples will be with the final barrel design. Each barrel will have a number on its underside since I ordered a multi-cavity mold. IBM gave a code to each barrel so they could know when a mold cavity needed to be adjusted if it was producing out-of-spec injection-molded parts.
I will continue making the hand adjustments to the prototypes and making those adjustments in the CAD files. Before opening orders I want the prototypes to be as close to the final production units as possible and I want to take photos and make a video beforehand.
I personally don't like right Shift Fn keys for a few reasons (and on this layout, the Fn key being too close to the arrows is something I really don't like for Home/End/PgUp/PgDn stuff), and manufacturability is a concern.gnarlsagan wrote:That is a great idea. Thank you for your input. I'm not at all married to the left bottom row mods. At a minimum I'd like to keep the arrow keys and the right Alt key. I made this based on your suggestion, and I actually think it's a bit cleaner:
Let's see if bhtooefr has any objections. If there is positive feedback, I'll update my post.
Okay, thanks for the feedback. So your original layout is likely the best option. Unless you have any further suggestions, count me in. ☺bhtooefr wrote:I personally don't like right Shift Fn keys for a few reasons (and on this layout, the Fn key being too close to the arrows is something I really don't like for Home/End/PgUp/PgDn stuff), and manufacturability is a concern.gnarlsagan wrote:That is a great idea. Thank you for your input. I'm not at all married to the left bottom row mods. At a minimum I'd like to keep the arrow keys and the right Alt key. I made this based on your suggestion, and I actually think it's a bit cleaner:
Let's see if bhtooefr has any objections. If there is positive feedback, I'll update my post.
1.75 U right shift means using a Caps Lock key if using Unicomp keys, IIRC, for starters.
6.25 U spacebar isn't something available for buckling spring period - the spacebar sizes appropriate for a 4704/122/M-based keyset are 2.5 (5576-C01), 5.75 (Unicomp 104/105/106-key), and 7 U (everything else). There's also the Wheelwriter spacebar at 7.25 U (which is a Model M-based design, but not exactly appropriate here), and the PC (XT) and AT spacebars at about 9.5 U, but those are out of scope.
Regarding the right Shift with Fn, the Caps Lock will work fine, correct? Otherwise, I'd want to keep everything else standard when I order my board.bhtooefr wrote:I personally don't like right Shift Fn keys for a few reasons (and on this layout, the Fn key being too close to the arrows is something I really don't like for Home/End/PgUp/PgDn stuff), and manufacturability is a concern.gnarlsagan wrote:That is a great idea. Thank you for your input. I'm not at all married to the left bottom row mods. At a minimum I'd like to keep the arrow keys and the right Alt key. I made this based on your suggestion, and I actually think it's a bit cleaner:
Let's see if bhtooefr has any objections. If there is positive feedback, I'll update my post.
1.75 U right shift means using a Caps Lock key if using Unicomp keys, IIRC, for starters.
6.25 U spacebar isn't something available for buckling spring period - the spacebar sizes appropriate for a 4704/122/M-based keyset are 2.5 (5576-C01), 5.75 (Unicomp 104/105/106-key), and 7 U (everything else). There's also the Wheelwriter spacebar at 7.25 U (which is a Model M-based design, but not exactly appropriate here), and the PC (XT) and AT spacebars at about 9.5 U, but those are out of scope.