Page 3 of 4
Posted: 15 May 2016, 18:18
by Ellipse
Nope Muirium I haven't been able to get a hold of xwhatsit in a while.
Interestingly the analog stuff has no detection errors in any of my testing, save that one key pad, so that side may be in good shape for now. It's the frequent disconnections that seem to be the largest issue.
Posted: 15 May 2016, 18:19
by Muirium
Are the disconnections a USB thing? Is the controller crashing?
Posted: 15 May 2016, 18:21
by Ellipse
Yes I think so. Maybe the smaller board requires different capacitor / resistor values so that the digital electronics function with the proper voltage? Maybe the controller is using too much voltage? That seems to be the case at least when testing the columns (the 0.7v original column strobing voltage compared to 1.7v of the newer controllers).
Posted: 15 May 2016, 18:27
by Muirium
Is the digital stuff all the same as on the original? Component wise?
If so, sounds like analog voodoo is at work. Resistors and capacitors make tuned circuits, for just the kind of analog signal work a capsense matrix requires. Their values must be tuned for the circuit in question. Path lengths and even proximity factor into that, as I hazily understand.
Posted: 15 May 2016, 18:30
by 0100010
Do the new F62 / F77 PCBs work OK with an original layout xwhatsit? From both the analog threshold POV and from the controller stability POV? Or, do you also see the !1 / 192 issue with the original controller?
Posted: 18 May 2016, 01:22
by Ellipse
Muirium yes just about everything is the same but there were some component changes. I think you're right that these resistor and capacitor values may need to change based on the path lengths and proximity which are shorter/closer on the smaller xwhatsit. That is well beyond my understanding though.
A QFN package component was changed to the equivalent SOIC package component
The full size 16mhz crystal was swapped for a half size one with the same specs including load capacitance, and RP1 and RP2 was replaced with a single 10 pin bused resistor array with the same specs (now labeled RP10).
And maybe other changes as well (wcass and phosphorglow did I miss anything?)
0100010 the original controllers work perfectly with zero issues on my F62/F77 prototypes. I've been using them without issue as my main keyboard since January.
Posted: 20 May 2016, 02:23
by Ellipse
An update - I tested a third USB cable that is 2 feet (the first two tested were 10 foot cables like the ones that will be used with the F62/F77 project. So far the smaller cable works 100% with no disconnections or crashing.
So I think it may be an issue with the value of the resistors for the USB connector - maybe they need to be adjusted to allow for longer USB cable lengths? Any ideas?
After that the major problem is the one key !1 / 192 issue, and also the high voltage when strobing the columns (not sure if the latter makes a difference in the controller operation.
Posted: 20 May 2016, 04:22
by wcass
That is some good clues.
Longer USB cable would have greater resistance than shorter USB cable - so maybe i need to lower the resistance at R1 and R2 on the D+ and D- lines. That would be easy to check.
Another thing might be that the D+ and D- lines pass right next to the crystal. Maybe i need to route the USB lines away from the crystal.
I'll draw that up this weekend.
Posted: 21 May 2016, 06:16
by wcass
Same size. I just moved the USB connector to leave the crystal more isolated. I also changed row order so that trace length from MCU to rows is more uniform.

- xwhatsit-wcass8.JPG (219.97 KiB) Viewed 11277 times
Posted: 29 May 2016, 20:53
by Ellipse
wcass your new design may do the trick, hopefully minimizing noise on the data lines for the USB - not sure if we should try further resistor/capacitor adjustments on the current compact xwhatsit controllers to be sure.
I compared VCC on the USB connector with a 2 foot and 10 foot USB cable and the voltage differences were negligible (0.01v) - the 2 foot one was about 5.17v (a little high but within the spec of USB) and the 10 foot one was about 5.16v. So I don't know why the 2 foot works just about 100% well compared to the 10 foot which crashes every few minutes.
Posted: 27 Jun 2016, 04:06
by Ellipse
re-posted from the Brand New Model F keyboards thread:
good news - the compact xwhatsit controllers are now problem free! joc just sent me his latest firmware with alternative debounce filter which has 100% fixed all firmware issues. wcass and phosphorglow's work on the updated prototype controller fixed the other issues with voltages.
The one "stuck" 1 ! key was likely user error (my error) as I connected the controller to the capacitive PCB for testing by jumper wires which I now know are probably too long for reliable operation. phosphorglow connected my F77 PCB to the compact xwhatsit controller with shorter wire and the stuck key was resolved.
Thanks again to all the hard work of red, wcass, phosphorglow, and joc for making the compact xwhatsit controller a reality!
Posted: 02 Jul 2016, 19:37
by phosphorglow
Super exciting stuff! My apologies for not being more useful and taking forever to actually get the soldering done... ;P
Just as Ellipse said - big thanks to red, wcass, joc, Ellipse, and xwhatsit for creating the whole thing in the first place.
Here's a bunch of hand soldered silliness:

- _MG_6510.jpg (340.6 KiB) Viewed 11044 times
Posted: 14 Jul 2016, 21:04
by __red__
Sorry I'm late back to the party - Gratz on those who did all the hard work.
Posted: 15 Jul 2016, 09:37
by hbar
phosphorglow wrote:
Here's a bunch of hand soldered silliness:
_MG_6510.jpg
If that doesn't prove that soldering SMD is no harder than THT, nothing does. Good work!
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 28 Jan 2020, 18:41
by kmnov2017
Does anyone have the Gerber's for these ?
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 29 Jan 2020, 04:08
by wcass
I thought i posted these somewhere, but maybe not.
I'm not sure i found the right BOM (it has been 3.5 years). I think this is it, but not sure.
Location Type Form Factor
C1;C2; 30pF; 0805;
C3; 4.7uF; 0805;
C4;C7;C8;C9;C10;C11;C12; 0.1uF; 0805;
C5; 1uF; 0805;
R1;R2; 22; 0805;
R3;R6; 20K; 0805;
R4;R7; 4.7K; 0805;
R5;R9; 10K; 0805;
R8; 1K; 0805;
RP12; 10K; 2512;
RP3;RP4; 100K; 1206;
U1; ATMEGA32U2; TQFP32;
U2; DAC101S101; TSOT-6;
U3;U4; LM339A; SO-14;
U5;U6; 74AHC595; SO-16;
X1; 16MHz;
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 29 Jan 2020, 12:24
by kmnov2017
wcass wrote: 29 Jan 2020, 04:08
I thought i posted these somewhere, but maybe not.
I'm not sure i found the right BOM (it has been 3.5 years). I think this is it, but not sure.
Location Type Form Factor
C1;C2; 30pF; 0805;
C3; 4.7uF; 0805;
C4;C7;C8;C9;C10;C11;C12; 0.1uF; 0805;
C5; 1uF; 0805;
R1;R2; 22; 0805;
R3;R6; 20K; 0805;
R4;R7; 4.7K; 0805;
R5;R9; 10K; 0805;
R8; 1K; 0805;
RP12; 10K; 2512;
RP3;RP4; 100K; 1206;
U1; ATMEGA32U2; TQFP32;
U2; DAC101S101; TSOT-6;
U3;U4; LM339A; SO-14;
U5;U6; 74AHC595; SO-16;
X1; 16MHz;
Thanks so much for this.
A few open questions:
1. C6 is missing in your parts list. I am assuming this is also 0.1 uF capacitor (in a 0805 package). Please confirm.
2. Size of this board is 77 X 25 mm. Is this correct?
3. What is the package size of the X1 Resonator?
4. Would you be able to generate a Pick and Place file? If not, can you post the Kicad / Diptrace file as well?
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 29 Jan 2020, 14:04
by kmnov2017
For those of you just tuning into the post, this is the modified Xwhatsit controller for the model F keyboards. Ellipse's new model Fs use this controller. This controller is the exact same thing Xwhatsit made in terms of schematics, but has a significantly smaller footprint (almost half the original size). The biggest problem with Xwhatsit was the shift registers used on the original design came in an exceedingly small packaging making it extremely difficult to hand solder. This modified design by Wcass uses a much larger shift register that is a lot easier to hand solder. Additionally, since the costs of PCBs and components have fallen over the past years, one can have these made for under 10 USD/EUR. Which is cheaper than the cypress CY8CKIT-059 (Minimum 23 EUR/25 USD In Europe).
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 29 Jan 2020, 14:10
by andrewjoy
Do you think it would be worth switching that connector to USB C ? mini usb is a bit old hat now and quite unreliable.
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 29 Jan 2020, 15:08
by kmnov2017
andrewjoy wrote: 29 Jan 2020, 14:10
Do you think it would be worth switching that connector to USB C ? mini usb is a bit old hat now and quite unreliable.
No, because soldering a USB C connector is even more difficult than the shift register.
Also how did you conclude that micro usb is not reliable??
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 29 Jan 2020, 22:07
by zrrion
It could be replaced with USB breakout pads, but not with another connector imo
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 30 Jan 2020, 02:02
by wcass
I actually did design a version with USB-C connector and one with USB breakout pads.
The USB-C connector is larger (in one demension) than micro USB and requires an additional resistor, so i had to move some stuff around and i think that C6 was eliminated because of that. I think i determined that it was not necessary. The crystal footprint is 7x4.1mm. Example:
ABLS7M2-16.000MHZ-D-2Y-T
I have not built either of these variants, but they are based on this version. Let me see if i can find those ...

- wcass8b.jpg (117.84 KiB) Viewed 9814 times
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 30 Jan 2020, 02:23
by wcass
i just realized that the width changed. i am sure there was some reason for it, but ... i have no idea why that happened.
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 30 Jan 2020, 10:01
by andrewjoy
kmnov2017 wrote: 29 Jan 2020, 15:08
Also how did you conclude that micro usb is not reliable??
RMA'ing far far too many blackberry devices back in the day when i worked for the local authority. Its better than mini USB tho, they had that on the old blue blackberry devices.... nightmare!
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 30 Jan 2020, 10:54
by kmnov2017
A USB cable once connected will probably never ever be removed from the keyboard.
But then again, the Gerber's are public, feel free to modify and attach whatever connectors works for you.
@wcass. The idea is to get these assembled by JLCPCB - so some of the parts need to be changed to match their parts list. I'll get in touch with you...
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 30 Jan 2020, 13:19
by anthonymak
I tried 5032 16Mhz crystal with the original xwhatsit model f controller and it works fine without any noticeable issue. the original crystal spec is just a little bit big.
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 30 Jan 2020, 17:15
by XMIT
kmnov2017 wrote: 30 Jan 2020, 10:54
A USB cable once connected will probably never ever be removed from the keyboard.
I disagree.
Attached cables are much more difficult to manage for travel and storage. Sure, if the keyboard is a daily driver and never moves, an attached cable is fine. But as a collector I have a strong preference for detachable.
I also prefer recessed mounts so that, if I'm sitting at a shallow desk front to rear, there isn't an aggressive cable bend right at the cable connection point that needs to be strain relieved. IBM Model M got this right.
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 30 Jan 2020, 19:47
by zrrion
Personally, I feel like detachable cables should connect to a securely mounted daughter board and not to the controller. The M gets a pass because it has a very sturdy connector, mini USB on the controller tends to be way too fragile in my experience.
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 31 Jan 2020, 06:45
by wcass
The files for USB-C.
As stated, the connector is larger so some things needed to move around. I had to move the Reset switch to the back.

- xwhatsit USB-C.png (54.89 KiB) Viewed 9604 times
Re: A Smaller Xwhatsit
Posted: 11 Feb 2020, 22:34
by Ellipse
Anyone interested in helping to speed up the xwhatsit GUI program?
Alas I know next to nothing about programming.
On my fairly new PC running Win 10, it always takes some time to start the program and it takes a while to import a saved layout file to a keyboard.
Also the saved layout file does not load the column skip settings - maybe that could be added (though some may not want this behavior!)?