Page 3 of 3
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 20:52
by 7bit
To improve your photo skills, you need some Round 4 key caps, because all that matters is the subject!
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 20:57
by Mrinterface
nntnam wrote:
Any advice

Hmmz, is that a sample of RAW post processing?
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 21:00
by GeorgeStorm
Possibly, may just be the shallow depth of field due to the aperture.
e.g.
DIP Switch by
George.Yoda, on Flickr
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 21:07
by Mrinterface
Darn, my camera only goes to f/2 ....

Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 21:10
by GeorgeStorm
That shot above was taken at F/5.6, so F/2 should easily be enough to get a nice amount of bokeh
I mean, I'm relatively new to photography, so I don't really know what other factors have a play in it, what camera are you using?
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 21:12
by Mrinterface
GeorgeStorm wrote:That shot above was taken at F/5.6, so F/2 should easily be enough to get a nice amount of bokeh
I mean, I'm relatively new to photography, so I don't really know what other factors have a play in it, what camera are you using?
Canon S100
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons100
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 21:16
by 7bit
GeorgeStorm wrote:.... I'm relatively new to photography ....
But you know you need RAW files

!
Better buy yourself a real camera with real lenses to shoot real-RAW files:
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 21:29
by Mrinterface
Plus you are going to need an extra backpack to carry all that around....

Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 21:49
by GeorgeStorm
Haha, I just have a 550D with kit lens which I got 2nd hand (only way I could afford it

)
Doesn't take up that much room really (although obviously you can't slide it into your pocket

)
Looks like a rather nice collection there 7bit
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 22:14
by thegunner100
OP, convince your mom that she doesn't need her D40 and buy yourself a 35mm f/1.8

. It's lightweight, shoots in low light, fast, decent bokeh, etc etc, and most importantly, only $200!

- D40, 3.5mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8, 1/40s, iso 200 w/ sb-400 flash
- DSC_4757_3_2.jpg (963.03 KiB) Viewed 3457 times
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 22:31
by 7bit
I recommend you this camera:

Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 22:45
by thegunner100
Hehe, that's a pretty sick looking point and shoot

Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 23:01
by webwit
I recognize the amateur photographer from a mile because they
must use focus and blur out the rest.

A picture of a keyboard completely in focus is not allowed. There's a similar thing in web design which is called the bevel/drop shadow syndrome. This dates back to the point when image editing software starting featuring bevel and drop shadow effects, which caused a flood wave of ugly beveled and drop shadowed buttons and graphics on 90ties web pages. Long story short: just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 23:18
by Acanthophis
It's easier to shoot at the widest aperture (higher shutter speed) by hand.
Not all of us have a tripod or insanely good High-ISO processing.
But I agree partially. If there are more photos to an object, focus/bokeh is a interesting choice of highlight things.
If you only have a single shot (like gunner's HHKB) I would use a much closer aperture (f8 or higher/lower, depends on the lens) for an infinite depth of field.
Posted: 12 Jul 2012, 23:19
by 002
There are worse photography fads at the moment too. *cough* Instagram *cough*
Posted: 13 Jul 2012, 00:06
by thegunner100
Mmm yeah, i just like taking random pictures for fun. The idea behind the picture was to highlight the HHKB logo; i wonder how it would look like if i shot it at a smaller aperture?
@deathadder - thanks for the tip, ill keep it in mind next time! I do have a tripod, but i didnt feel like taking it out just for some hhkb pics
Posted: 13 Jul 2012, 10:50
by 7bit
webwit wrote:I recognize the amateur photographer from a mile because they
must use focus and blur out the rest.

A picture of a keyboard completely in focus is not allowed. ....
Photographing keyboards on a laminate floor is also amateurish!
