Page 3 of 4
Posted: 04 May 2011, 16:58
by keyboardlover
Ok, it's not just the $8,000,000 keyboard collection.
I'm now convinced that you really ARE insane.
Posted: 04 May 2011, 17:05
by webwit
I'll add it to the list of defenses against the theory that the story didn't make sense.
Webwit is convincingly insane because he noted I have violently disagreed with arguments of which I have no idea what they are.
Posted: 04 May 2011, 17:30
by keyboardlover
That seems fine. I'd add at the end "and were not made clear to me".
Trying to figure out the point your making is like trying to understand when my Mom tells a story...
There's a beginning and end, but no middle. Also, I have no idea who the people involved are.
Posted: 04 May 2011, 19:10
by webwit
Blah blah blah. You haven't even named an argument that was not clear to you. You're full of shit.
Re: TSA-Nazis catch Rihanna Sheik Bin-Laden- World is now sa
Posted: 04 May 2011, 19:52
by keyboardlover
No, I'm full of love...for keyboards. My name is not "keyboardshitter".
Posted: 04 May 2011, 20:42
by 7bit
Re: TSA-Nazis catch Rihanna Sheik Bin-Laden- World is now sa
Posted: 04 May 2011, 20:44
by keyboardlover
Lol, nice. That might become my new avatar!
Posted: 04 May 2011, 20:58
by itlnstln
I know what it's supposed to be, but somehow, that gif looks pornographic.
Re: TSA-Nazis catch Rihanna Sheik Bin-Laden- World is now sa
Posted: 04 May 2011, 21:35
by keyboardlover
Europeans are into beastiality.
Posted: 04 May 2011, 22:10
by webwit
What a joke. No body, no photos. And coming from the US government, which among others fabricated the evidence for the fantasy WOMD.
They did not kill OBL. I did. Unfortunately I don't have photos and I burned the body and scattered the ashes. I came to collect the bounty. Wait, I do have the photos, but I chose not to show them, because all evidence is debatable. What is the point of evidence anyway? I think we should abandon this concept.
Posted: 04 May 2011, 22:12
by ricercar
OK, you get to fight the Navy Seals for the reward. Ready Set Go.
Posted: 04 May 2011, 22:19
by webwit
It's a good thing they brought the "brave" navy seals into story. Normal business is to cower behind drones and send in the bombs, then clean up the collateral mess later.
Re: TSA-Nazis catch Rihanna Sheik Bin-Laden- World is now sa
Posted: 04 May 2011, 22:26
by keyboardlover
Actually word on the street is George Bush pulled the trigger. Lot of secrecy in our country. Secrecy can be an important tactical advantage. Shame our media is such a PITA.
Posted: 05 May 2011, 00:23
by webwit
I think we should start a deskthority4children subforum. Once you grow a brain and some hair on your balls, you may proceed to the grown up forum. Some will never get there.
Posted: 05 May 2011, 00:27
by keyboardlover
Why so serious?
Posted: 05 May 2011, 00:36
by webwit
Because I had an opinion, and you started to attack me personally, repeatedly, without substance, and when I ask you repeatedly for arguments, you cower away in silly posts like the above or statements that you don't understand any of it. Chiiiiiicken.
Talking about animals, I saw some dogs play together in the park today. Couple of big ones. Then a small, wincing one approached, yet full of enthusiasm, wanting to play with the others. Excitingly he joined and barked around. Showed his teeth, growling. A big dog turned around, showed his massive teeth and barked loudly back. Alas, the small dog left with its tail between the legs, howling softly about how mean the big dog was. Silly little fucker.
Posted: 05 May 2011, 00:42
by keyboardlover
Is that what happened?
Edit: I made webwit change his avatar. As a wise princess once said, "rofl".
Posted: 05 May 2011, 06:27
by Crazy9000
webwit wrote:The story does not make sense. They say they preferred him dead, but if one goes in like that it is to take a person alive. Which would be logical because you want to, uhm, debrief the guy, like Sadam. Otherwise you bomb the place. They say they didn't do that to protect the innocent, except in all those wikileaked cases, like the famous bombed wedding. This has been consistent, because after a tip they rather kill innocent civilians by bombing the place than go in on the ground and risk their own lives. So it's a sick claim. Looking at the crashed helicopter my guess is the operation was at least a partly fuckup. Body tossed into sea, no pictures? Story stinks. So now we have a story from the USA government (pathological liars) with major inconsistencies. I.e. you have no way to know what really happened and no tools to separate truth from lies, and everybody is parroting the propaganda.
Well if you just bombed the place, it could be a situation of "we bombed a building that we THINK Osama was in, and he PROBABLY died. The plan would be to go in and have a confirmed kill, and retain the body.
This is where the next part of the story stops making any sense at all. Why would you just dump all the evidence ASAP and not even release any photo evidence? I honestly don't know what the hell is going on there.
The only evidence they've really put out is a DNA test against his sister, which matches it 99.9%. That initially sounds like a done deal, but talk to anyone who does DNA and they'll tell you otherwise. 99.9% means one out of a thousand people would match the profile.
Posted: 05 May 2011, 11:05
by 7bit
Crazy9000 wrote:webwit wrote:The story does not make sense. [...] I.e. you have no way to know what really happened and no tools to separate truth from lies, and everybody is parroting the propaganda.
Well if you just bombed the place, it could be a situation of "we bombed a building that we THINK Osama was in, and he PROBABLY died. The plan would be to go in and have a confirmed kill, and retain the body.
This is where the next part of the story stops making any sense at all. Why would you just dump all the evidence ASAP and not even release any photo evidence? I honestly don't know what the hell is going on there.
The only evidence they've really put out is a DNA test against his sister, which matches it 99.9%. That initially sounds like a done deal, but talk to anyone who does DNA and they'll tell you otherwise. 99.9% means one out of a thousand people would match the profile.
It would have been much better to catch him alive, put him in a trial and lock him in a jail.
Or better:
Put him in a zoo as a tourist attraction!
Posted: 05 May 2011, 12:11
by webwit
Pah, evidence, useless stuff. Only leads to endless discussion. I propose we abandon this concept.
Really..talking about parroting propaganda. The day when evidence was snubbed.
It stinks, it stinks, it stinks.
Show us the boooody!!! Hey, they lured the Netherlands into waging war in Iraq and Afghanistan, I pay taxes, I want to see THE EVIDENCE. Otherwise, I default it as all lies. Simple as that. They aren't showing photos, because there aren't any. Compare to all the other assholes they killed or caught, and the immediate release of photo evidence, like Sadam or his killed children. They even showed the plate in the leg of one of his sons.
Posted: 05 May 2011, 13:35
by 7bit
webwit wrote:...
Show us the boooody!!! ...
There is no
body!
The whole thing is set up to make sure they fulfilled their promise (getting rid of Bin Laden) so they can end the war without being the losers.
Posted: 05 May 2011, 13:46
by keyboardlover
Getting rid of Bin Laden doesn't mean the war on terrorism ends.
Posted: 05 May 2011, 16:11
by ripster
Of course not.
But as an Ugly American I lolled.
Meanwhile the EU has indicted Gaddafi's henchmen.
Last time that happened it took nearly a decade to finally kill Milosevic with Dutch food.
Posted: 05 May 2011, 20:19
by 7bit
ripster wrote:...
Last time that happened it took nearly a decade to finally kill Milosevic with Dutch food.
I'm sure it would not have taken a decade to kill Osama with American food.
Also, he is as dead as Schroedinger's cat!
Posted: 05 May 2011, 21:44
by ripster
Crazy9000 wrote:webwit wrote:The story does not make sense. They say they preferred him dead, but if one goes in like that it is to take a person alive. Which would be logical because you want to, uhm, debrief the guy, like Sadam. Otherwise you bomb the place. They say they didn't do that to protect the innocent, except in all those wikileaked cases, like the famous bombed wedding. This has been consistent, because after a tip they rather kill innocent civilians by bombing the place than go in on the ground and risk their own lives. So it's a sick claim. Looking at the crashed helicopter my guess is the operation was at least a partly fuckup. Body tossed into sea, no pictures? Story stinks. So now we have a story from the USA government (pathological liars) with major inconsistencies. I.e. you have no way to know what really happened and no tools to separate truth from lies, and everybody is parroting the propaganda.
Well if you just bombed the place, it could be a situation of "we bombed a building that we THINK Osama was in, and he PROBABLY died. The plan would be to go in and have a confirmed kill, and retain the body.
This is where the next part of the story stops making any sense at all. Why would you just dump all the evidence ASAP and not even release any photo evidence? I honestly don't know what the hell is going on there.
The only evidence they've really put out is a DNA test against his sister, which matches it 99.9%. That initially sounds like a done deal, but talk to anyone who does DNA and they'll tell you otherwise. 99.9% means one out of a thousand people would match the profile.
You know, NOW I know why OCN mods are so stubborn.
I thought they were crazy bastards divorced from reality.
Especially that "use PS/2 instead of USB" stuff.
That crazy talk man.
P.S. I'm glad OCN Gameserver Mods don't have forum banhammers.
Posted: 06 May 2011, 01:35
by Crazy9000
ripster wrote:
You know, NOW I know why OCN mods are so stubborn.
I thought they were crazy bastards divorced from reality.
Especially that "use PS/2 instead of USB" stuff.
That crazy talk man.
P.S. I'm glad OCN Gameserver Mods don't have forum banhammers.
I never said I doubted he was dead
. I just don't understand why they keep changing the story, and haven't really given any proof.
Although if you listen to the radio after 10pm you can hear some pretty good conspiracy theories.
Posted: 06 May 2011, 06:45
by ripster
Unlike OCN I'm sure both Osama and PS/2 are deader than a redshirt on Star Trek.
Posted: 06 May 2011, 13:54
by webwit
I bet you buried your PS/2 supporting computer at sea, yet you don't have any proof of that.
Posted: 06 May 2011, 16:59
by ripster
Jeez. You and Crazy9000 don't even believe gravity.
- ddf379f3e5faa9d594b6d0c7f3a40b5bb6903784.png (212.78 KiB) Viewed 4763 times
Posted: 06 May 2011, 17:12
by webwit
Strangest logic.
Some entity comes out, "Hey, we have done this thing. He was armed. Wait. He was not armed."
"Show us the evidence."
"No."
"Uhm..."
"Stop these conspiracy theories! What is wrong with you??"
Riiight.