Page 25 of 34
Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 10:34
by phetto
If I could get a ergodox that looks exactly like this, I would say that it is the perfect keyboard.

Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 15:19
by L!athus
Been reading up on this build for a gd while now. Decided its time to express my interest. Hopefully, by the time its ready for GB its not gonna cost me my limbs or family jewels to get 1 of these.
The waiting game continues.... Fingers itching for an ergodox.

Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 15:40
by Findecanor
lowkey144 wrote:Regarding the cornstarch/silicon version of sugru, it is not ideal for highly visible applications, but I can vouch for it being a very good alternative for emulating the desirable physical properties of sugru.
Interesting... What kind of silicone do you use? Moulding silicone, caulk or something else entirely?
Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 17:02
by L!athus
I'm assuming the concoction AF refers to for making your own sugru is listed
here. Haven't tried it but interesting to know.
Posted: 18 Dec 2012, 03:47
by AloisiusFauxly
Yup, I've used just plain ol' silicone caulking
like this.
Posted: 18 Dec 2012, 07:52
by lowkey144
The smell of acetone(nail polish remover) while setting should be your guide, in general you want the most generic silicon you can find no silicone II for example, but I don't know what the branding would be anywhere but the states. Alosiuus linked a version that will definitely work. I usually buy the off-brand basic version at walmart when I need a large amount for a project. I recently used it to repair my bicycle rack pad for my car. but generally wherever sugru would be applicable, so too will the cornstarch variety.
Posted: 19 Dec 2012, 21:01
by DrSchlock
I am interested if there is a group buy for this.
Posted: 23 Dec 2012, 06:59
by Loafers
Why are the keys not aligned? Is it more ergonomic that way?
Re: Split ergonomic keyboard project.
Posted: 23 Dec 2012, 16:57
by hoggy
You've got it. The staggering is there to allow for the differing lengths of your fingers. Well, maybe not your fingers specifically... It doesn't take long to get used to, and makes quite a difference.
Posted: 23 Dec 2012, 17:34
by webwit
The one failure of the Datahand! You cannot change the individual finger staggering, while relative finger lengths are not equal. Most notably the
ring finger can be shorter than index finger, but also longer. This would be hard to fix on any keyboard where switches are attached to the PCB which is made out of one piece for one or two hands.
Posted: 24 Dec 2012, 23:06
by bisl
webwit wrote:You cannot change the individual finger staggering
ErgoDox v2: per-finger PCBs?
Posted: 25 Dec 2012, 00:21
by Icarium
Shouldn't be all that hard but is also not as important as it is on the Datahand.

Posted: 05 Jan 2013, 22:23
by gdaian
Vierax wrote:it just doesn't complete the whole attempt I have of the “nearly perfect” keyboard
I'm interested to hear how you think it could be improved. I think it may be a bit bulky and wireless would be fantastic. Otherwise it closely matches my ideal keyboard (until we get chorded wearable keyers, that is). I haven't seen anything so compelling in any commercial model to date.
Posted: 06 Jan 2013, 00:40
by bhtooefr
Vierax wrote:Moreover, I don't want to buy an Ergodox (even if I fully respect the team work and think it's a great project, it just doesn't complete the whole attempt I have of the “nearly perfect” keyboard) but I'll fell sad if the groupbuy is screwed by MD or anyone else.
Yeah, it's an awesome project that I want to see succeed, but one that I'm completely uninterested in. (I'll take a modern 104-key ANSI capacitive buckling spring board, myself.)
Posted: 08 Jan 2013, 01:45
by hdss
Also interested for a buy, from EU. Any activity on a group buy?
Posted: 09 Jan 2013, 13:06
by wasabah
I would be interested in a group buy or something like that in the EU!
Posted: 10 Jan 2013, 06:01
by AloisiusFauxly
BugBuster wrote:BTW, does anyone know what's the most quiet switch for both programming and occasional gaming?
I have the same usage as you and I went with browns for my build and there is almost no sound at the actuation point. I'm still getting noise from bottoming out, though I imagine that would be similar for most switches.
Posted: 10 Jan 2013, 09:17
by dirge
AloisiusFauxly wrote:BugBuster wrote:BTW, does anyone know what's the most quiet switch for both programming and occasional gaming?
I have the same usage as you and I went with browns for my build and there is almost no sound at the actuation point. I'm still getting noise from bottoming out, though I imagine that would be similar for most switches.
O rings should lessen the sound a bit mate, think wasd keyboards sell them.
Posted: 10 Jan 2013, 09:22
by AloisiusFauxly
Eh, the noise doesn't bother me enough. Besides, I should probably just learn to feel for the actuation point, from what I've read.
Posted: 10 Jan 2013, 19:56
by 7bit
Mayby, I will do a 2nd run with mount plate and 7BIT-layout option.
It will ...
- be cheaper
- take almost forever to be delivered
- come with any choice of switches, inculding the popular MXLOCK and when I can get hands on them, Matias-ALPS.
- have a solid mount plate

Posted: 11 Jan 2013, 10:28
by TheQsanity
Just wondering, does anyone type any faster with the Kinesis, ergoDox, or anything of that shape?
Posted: 11 Jan 2013, 10:35
by Vierax
TheQsanity wrote:Just wondering, does anyone type any faster with the Kinesis, ergoDox, or anything of that shape?
As learning an alternative KB layout as DSK or Colemak, It's more a quest of comfort than speed.

Posted: 11 Jan 2013, 10:36
by Jim66
TheQsanity wrote:Just wondering, does anyone type any faster with the Kinesis, ergoDox, or anything of that shape?
You'll type fast on any layout that you've gotten used to. This is more of a comfort/ergonomic thing (thumb clusters etc...). I guess you could argue that you might be able to type faster because its layout is more optimized; but then again, that sentence is awfully cringey and you'd really have to be being held up by a traditional staggered layout to see a significant difference in speed.
Posted: 11 Jan 2013, 10:54
by mikelanding
TheQsanity wrote:Just wondering, does anyone type any faster with the Kinesis, ergoDox, or anything of that shape?
Me. I do type faster on Kinesis compare to HHKB
For me, Kinesis is much more conform than HHKB. I have RSI now. Cant type on any normal kb for long. But with Kinesis, I can work for more than 10 hours. Only my left pinky will sore. Guess that is my weakest finger of 10

Posted: 11 Jan 2013, 15:43
by sordna
Add a footswitch or palm keys to relieve your pinkies. It works!
@AloisiusFauxly, thanks for the helpful info! Palm keys are a must for me, I'll add them when I get the ErgoDox.
Posted: 11 Jan 2013, 19:24
by ibnteo
Connectors can be placed inside the body, with the possibility to use the Mini-USB from Teensy, without connectors. This keyboard can be anywhere balk sticking wires will not interfere.
Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 21:31
by Vierax
ibnteo wrote:
Connectors can be placed inside the body, with the possibility to use the Mini-USB from Teensy, without connectors. This keyboard can be anywhere balk sticking wires will not interfere.
Welcome here
I think, and I think it's the thought of the Ergodox team, that is not a very wise design because the natural position want users to set the two halves in an inverted V position (like the Greek letter Lambda “Λ” ) and the top of cases are closer than bottom. Moreover, this middle cable don't allow you to put, for example, a paper sheet or a notebook or a block between the two halves to copy some notes on a text editor.
Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 16:20
by Dreadwyrm
This looks pretty cool, does somebody know what the "raw aircraft grade aluminum" case is supposed to look like?
Posted: 14 Jan 2013, 20:38
by hoggy
Posted: 14 Jan 2013, 21:21
by bisl
hoggy wrote:Saw this on kbdmania...
Personally, I'd take the dox hands-down over any keyboard with row staggering. I think that might be the top selling point of the board to me.