Posted: 21 Mar 2011, 22:47
Not in the early 90s. Super Nintendo? pah!
it was getting close, Playstation pretty much finished it off in '95, and N64 arrived in '96. Doom was great, but only one game and that's why I think the golden age for PC was later. Maybe '98 and Half-Life was the beginning of that era.Brian8bit wrote:The Amiga 1200 was dead by 1994 wasn't it?
Really? I only played PC games as a kid.IanM wrote:it was getting close, Playstation pretty much finished it off in '95, and N64 arrived in '96. Doom was great, but only one game and that's why I think the golden age for PC was later. Maybe '98 and Half-Life was the beginning of that era.Brian8bit wrote:The Amiga 1200 was dead by 1994 wasn't it?
yes, but I'm saying the best era was later. The peak for PC gaming made it as desirable, if not more desirable than consoles for most gamers. There isn't really a disagreement here, actually you and sixty are right - the earlier comment was that pc gaming has "always been dying" - it hasn't, and early-mid 90s it's definitely on the upward curve. I just confused the point by saying the 16bit (Amiga & ST) computers where the real kings of that early 90s era.Crazy9000 wrote:Really? I only played PC games as a kid...
...Lots of great games for PC around then.
Too many people from geekhack registered.ripster wrote:If PC gaming isn't dying why are OCN keyboard posts getting stupider?
Ah you mean "popular" or "mainstream" as opposed to "good". I can agree on that.IanM wrote:yes, but I'm saying the best era was later. The peak for PC gaming made it as desirable, if not more desirable than consoles for most gamers. There isn't really a disagreement here, actually you and sixty are right - the earlier comment was that pc gaming has "always been dying" - it hasn't, and early-mid 90s it's definitely on the upward curve. I just confused the point by saying the 16bit (Amiga & ST) computers where the real kings of that early 90s era.