Linus Tech Tips will be doing a video on the Model M...
- Yeastyzen
- Location: Boston
- Main keyboard: Zowie Celeritas
- Main mouse: G303
- Favorite switch: Brown
- DT Pro Member: -
- Yeastyzen
- Location: Boston
- Main keyboard: Zowie Celeritas
- Main mouse: G303
- Favorite switch: Brown
- DT Pro Member: -
-
- Location: UK
- Main keyboard: Filco ZERO green alps, Model F 122 Terminal
- Main mouse: Ducky Secret / Roller Mouse Pro 1
- Favorite switch: MX Mount Topre / Model F Buckling
- DT Pro Member: 0167
He got quite a bit wrong ( but overall a good video) , saying the PS2 version was the 2nd gen when in fact there was an AT version with lock lights between the original and the PS/2
His diagram was for a model F flipper and not a model M.
Giving credit for the M being the first true 101 disgn was right but it should have been mentioned that this was clearly a refinement of the 122F terminal design.
No mention of the vastly superior model F.
No mention of the UK or Mexico plants.
No mention of the drop in quality before lexmark
Few pictures but no mention of the SSK.
Still a cool video.
His diagram was for a model F flipper and not a model M.
Giving credit for the M being the first true 101 disgn was right but it should have been mentioned that this was clearly a refinement of the 122F terminal design.
No mention of the vastly superior model F.
No mention of the UK or Mexico plants.
No mention of the drop in quality before lexmark
Few pictures but no mention of the SSK.
Still a cool video.
- Norman_
- Location: New Jersey
- Main keyboard: RedScarf II+ (RS78)
- Main mouse: Zowie FK2
- Favorite switch: Anything Alps
- DT Pro Member: -
Also, one that really bothered me, is he said it wasn't mechanical because it uses a membrane instead of a PCB. Mind blowing how he could say that the Model M isn't mechanical for any reason, let alone that.andrewjoy wrote: He got quite a bit wrong ( but overall a good video) , saying the PS2 version was the 2nd gen when in fact there was an AT version with lock lights between the original and the PS/2
His diagram was for a model F flipper and not a model M.
Giving credit for the M being the first true 101 disgn was right but it should have been mentioned that this was clearly a refinement of the 122F terminal design.
No mention of the vastly superior model F.
No mention of the UK or Mexico plants.
No mention of the drop in quality before lexmark
Few pictures but no mention of the SSK.
Still a cool video.
- DustGod
- Yet another IBM snob
- Location: Italy
- Main keyboard: IBM Model F 6110344 "Battleship"
- Main mouse: Unbranded vertical mouse
- Favorite switch: Beam Spring | Buckling Spring
- DT Pro Member: 0196
- DustGod
- Yet another IBM snob
- Location: Italy
- Main keyboard: IBM Model F 6110344 "Battleship"
- Main mouse: Unbranded vertical mouse
- Favorite switch: Beam Spring | Buckling Spring
- DT Pro Member: 0196
The exact definition of "mechanical keyboard", as already said in this and other places on the Internet, has some fuzzy edges.
For example, I don't agree with the definition "if it has a PCB it's mechanical, otherwise it's not". The membranes are less durable and less resistant to humidity, but if you swap a contact circuit printed on a board with an identical one on membranes nothing will change from an operational point of view - more so if the membranes are mounted on a steel plate. The difference in quality is given by the switches, not the sensing mechanism.
(if the sensing mechanisms that we're comparing are based on the same technology of course. Naturally, capacitive instead of contact-based does imply a difference in quality.)
For example, I don't agree with the definition "if it has a PCB it's mechanical, otherwise it's not". The membranes are less durable and less resistant to humidity, but if you swap a contact circuit printed on a board with an identical one on membranes nothing will change from an operational point of view - more so if the membranes are mounted on a steel plate. The difference in quality is given by the switches, not the sensing mechanism.
(if the sensing mechanisms that we're comparing are based on the same technology of course. Naturally, capacitive instead of contact-based does imply a difference in quality.)
- depletedvespene
- Location: Chile
- Main keyboard: IBM Model F122
- Main mouse: Logitech G700s
- Favorite switch: buckling spring
- DT Pro Member: 0224
- Contact:
... something that carries with it the danger of spreading manifestly wrong information, even if it should benefit those of us "in the know" (like kids rejecting Lexmark-made Model M keyboards "because they're rubberdome", "Linus said so!")