Or was it just the early ones? Last week I picked up some WheelWriters, in varying degrees of distress. The oldest was a 2, the youngest a 1000 made by Lexmark.
It seemed to me that the board on the 1000 was "less clicky" than that on the 2, but I'm not sure whether that's just my imagination or not.
Can anybody enlighten me, please?
Were all IBM WheelWriter keyboards buckling spring?
-
- Location: --
- Main keyboard: --
- Main mouse: --
- Favorite switch: --
- DT Pro Member: -
Not sure about wheelwriters, but it was probably those goddamn rivets that come off M keyboards are what are causing less tactility.
- FXT
- XT
- Location: North Carolina
- Main keyboard: F107/F122/XT/3278
- Favorite switch: Buckling springs
- DT Pro Member: 0204
I'm not convinced. I've had several Ms with varying amounts of rivets and they more or less all felt the same. I don't think the rivets matter to an extent, obviously if it's missing enough it won't work properly.
- DustGod
- Yet another IBM snob
- Location: Italy
- Main keyboard: IBM Model F 6110344 "Battleship"
- Main mouse: Unbranded vertical mouse
- Favorite switch: Beam Spring | Buckling Spring
- DT Pro Member: 0196
I currently have two Model Ms (regular and 122) and a WheelWriter. Based on these and others, I believe that a high number of broken rivets slows down the return of some keys (they feel less springy). But the sound does not change.
- DustGod
- Yet another IBM snob
- Location: Italy
- Main keyboard: IBM Model F 6110344 "Battleship"
- Main mouse: Unbranded vertical mouse
- Favorite switch: Beam Spring | Buckling Spring
- DT Pro Member: 0196
On a side note: I haven't took apart the WheelWriter yet, but the keys feel *a lot* springy, even though that typewriter has been typed on to shreds (the caps are extremely shiny, not a common sight for IBM keycaps, made of the densest PBT known). I believe this is due to the fact that the board is attached to a 10 kg printing element.
- 2ter
- Location: vienna, austria
- Main keyboard: olympia carrera or m from 87, apple M0118 (office)
- Main mouse: wheel mouse optical
- Favorite switch: clicky
- DT Pro Member: -
- Contact:
The wheelwriter keyboard i took apart didn't have a rubber sheet but o-rings instead . This made it louder/more clicky
-
- Location: Italy
- DT Pro Member: -
https://trello.com/c/uYSx2zmT/7-ibm-whe ... -5-o-rings
Don't some reason there are these curious O-rings equipped onto the IBM Wheelwriter 5, the earliest typewriter equipped with Buckling Springs. They wrap around the barrel to provide a cushion for the keystem when it bottoms out.
These O-rings reduces the volume of the Wheelwriter 5 keyboard, by cushioning the keystem when it bottoms out. You'd imagine that the sound of the typewriter itself would definitely overshadow the meager noise of the actuation, but actually when the key bottoms out, it gives off a loud clang that you feel in your bones.
These are compatible with any IBM/Unicomp Buckling Spring barrel. However, in later buckling spring keyboards, such as the IBM Model M and Wheelwriter 3 or Wheelwriter 1000, the keyswitches are already quieter by design, despite the fact that it has no O-Rings.
In fact, when you add O-rings on this newer buckling spring design, it sounds only as loud as a ThinkPad rubber dome keyboard. So if you're thinking about bringing your Model M to work, try installing some O-Rings.
Measurements
Inside diameter: 12mm
Outside diameter: 16mm
Height: 2mm
12mm ID is not much smaller than 1/2" (inch); which is the size of Danco #10 o-rings. They are usually sold in 10 packs for ~$2 USD.
https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=60043.0;wap2
- zrrion
- Location: United States
- Main keyboard: F122
- Main mouse: Microsoft IntelliMouse
- Favorite switch: ALPS SKCC Cream
- DT Pro Member: -
- Contact:
I had this happen with an action writer. removing the mat when bold modding has a similar effect and I greatly prefer how it makes the M feel2ter wrote: 28 Mar 2018, 23:02 The wheelwriter keyboard i took apart didn't have a rubber sheet but o-rings instead . This made it louder/more clicky